Step's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Catalyst (No Sample Edit)]

Hey man. Your review request in the Review for Review thread got left out so I thought I'd come and save the day.

This is fun stuff! I like the airy atmosphere you've got going. There's a lot of space in your mix, because you really don't have many intricate details in this (plus not much reverb). It's very down-to-earth and easy to listen to. Plus, your mix is just crystal clear. I can hear each intrinsic element perfectly. You also take time to introduce each one gradually, making me appreciate the combination of all those elements a lot more.

The sounds you've used... I was first in two minds about them. They sound quite raw and when I heard the sawtooth synth come in at 0:08 the first thing I thought was "this sounds like some FL Studio 3xOsc preset ugh what is he doing".

Got to admit though, your simple and raw synths have some sort of stylistic value that grew on me. The meagre use of reverb, quick attack times and raw, harsh synths all work together surprisingly well, and even when on their own they sound pretty bad (like at 0:08), in sections like the part around the one minute marker they came together wonderfully.

I've got some issues with this. The structure is fairly lacklustre... you've got an unchanging background and melodies playing in the foreground that aren't very related to each other. There's a lack of effects that aren't standard sweeps/reverse effects I've heard a thousand times before.

Some of the melodies are pretty flat (1:14 and 3:09 for instance), which is a shame because the sweet arpeggiated stuff at around 0:59 really set high expectations, at least for me. There's also a sizeable amount of time in the track where little is going on, making the track pretty boring at times.

There's a transition at the end which I didn't like. At 4:00 too many elements are taken out of the song at one go, which sounded a bit lame upon first listen. I can also say the same about the ending haha. I know it's pretty standard to make a trance track with a club intro/outro but screw standards, you could've made a better ending than that!

Anyway, that's all I've got to say. Lovely little track you've got here with a distinct style and a sweet mix. Good job!

7/10
5/5

[She Was Picking Flowers]

This is an NGADM Round 4 review.

--

If I heard this without knowing it was yours, I would've still guessed it was, but despite that, this feels like an entirely new style for you (at least from what I've heard in your portfolio). You've got this really interesting blend between orchestral instruments and electronic instruments which is in the same light as InvisibleObserver's submission. The instruments work together surprisingly well.

Apart from that cool little thing, you've got a lot of the stuff in here that I love about most of your tracks. Clarity, a brilliant blend of instruments and harmonies, memorable/unique style, and a lot of character in each instrument that you use. I also loved the section in the ending. What a beautiful and suitable way to end the track. It sounds sweet, but with a slight melancholy tinge with your use of minor chords.

Unfortunately, while I may be the one of the only ones in the judging panel who may think this, I find this track to be not as melodically impressive as your previous tracks, so in that light I concur with johnfn. Only after around 2 minutes did I start to truly enjoy the melodies of this piece (especially the amazing melody work in the outro).

Before then, the melody seemed quite flat and directionless. You sometimes have a habit of doing this, I think. Your tracks would have some brilliant melodies in most of the sections, but in some sections the melodies just wander around aimlessly, and over half of this track had unsatisfactory melodic material (at least compared to the high standard of quality you set upon yourself). The bassline is awesome though.

I don't think this is your best work. I actually personally think this is my least favourite from you. That doesn't mean it's not an excellent track!

Score: 9/10

steampianist responds:

Thank you for the review

It seems im getting mix reviews for this :) sort of predicted this actually.
But I had to pace my ideas and I used some for my vocaloid and steampunk ep.

So yeah ahehehe

[Ascension]

This is an NGADM Round 4 review.

--

This feels a lot like your style. I think for Round 1, maybe Round 2, and Round 3, you were diverging across various styles, and now you've hit home again. You're good at loads of styles, but this seems like your niche to me. Beautiful composition in both the piano and the vocals. I love your chords. They make me curious - have you ever formally learnt jazz or at least classical theory?

One of my absolute favourite things about this track would be what you've got going at 1:44. What a beautiful momentary instrumental section that not only breaks up the monotony of having you singing in a ballad manner all the time, but has a way of communicating just as well as the lyrics do. Not even going to bother giving my analysis of your singing voice by the way. You know very well I think it's omgfkhdsuafghsg.

I was saying in the judge Skype chat earlier... how is it possible to find anything not to like in this track? While etherealwinds had some issues that were pretty apparent (to me, at least), this track doesn't actually have anything that I can call "bad" (well, apart from the occasional clipping in the track).

The only thing I can do at this point is compare it to etherealwinds's track. Like I said, I think your track doesn't have levelling issues or whatever - everything is tastefully done and highly indicative that you know what you're doing. However, I feel that compared to etherealwinds you played it a bit more safe. His track had more focus on using instruments to build an atmosphere, plus it was more original.

Because of that dilemma between your track having less issues than etherealwinds's, but his track being more original and thoughtful in terms of atmosphere, I think I'll have to give you both the same score. Brilliant work.

Score: 9.6/10

headphoamz responds:

As always, thanks for a detailed and descriptive review, Step! :)

[Mystic's Shore]

This is an NGADM Round 4 review.

--

Whether you've achieved an authentic Chinese atmosphere or not in this track is something I wouldn't be able to say myself. I don't listen to Chinese music (not because I don't like it - I've just never had the opportunity to listen to actual Chinese music). Whatever the case, what I can say is that the atmosphere in this blew my face off. Wonderful work with the soundscape-building, and the melodies are just touching and beautiful (with cadences that are pretty characteristic to your style haha).

The way the instruments worked together at the beginning and how they started picking up at 1:10 is just masterful. And let me get this straight - you've been composing with a DAW for a few months? I don't know where I read that or if it's even true, but if it is, you're probably god. Oh and amazing singing, voice made of the finest honey, blahblahblah.

The most apparent issue is that unfortunately your voice is too upfront once again! You give a lot of attention to your instruments, ambience and all that, and the vocal layers that differ both harmonically and rhythmically drive the song forward perfectly, but the balance is a little wack, making this not as enveloping as it should have been, and occasionally a bit empty. The electronic ambience at the beginning is a bit loud, just like the vocals.

Also, the drums feel unfortunately a bit underpowered. For a song like this, a more definable beat during the busier sections (something like ProudAardvark's excellent percussive work in this track - http://goo.gl/GgjQlq) would have been more impressive. As long as you don't milk it and end up messing up the subtle atmosphere, drums like those would have been such a great addition (although maybe not fitting well with the "authentic Chinese music" premise).

This is incredibly well-made. By far my favourite of yours, despite the levelling issues and the underpowered percussion. Truly brilliant work.

Score: 9.6/10

etherealwinds responds:

Thank you for the review! Yeah it took a few listens for me to realise that I'd probably mixed my vocals in a little loudly. My ears go strange after I've heard a song and my voice so many times over and over again haha! I got FL Studio 9 as my first DAW a little earlier this year and it took some getting used to. In fact, I'm not even sure how to create drum loops such as the ones you've linked. I still have so much to learn, although I remember years and years ago I had an FL Studio trial my dad used to mess around on and making drum loops was the only thing I did on it. That was back when it was called Fruity Loops though haha! Long time ago.

So glad you liked it and really, thank you! :)

[footsteps]

This is an NGADM Round 4 review.

--

Oh my god, the melodies here are so good it's insane. I can't get over how good they are. I think that this track has some of the most beautiful piano melodies from the whole NGADM (rivalled by maybe people like ChronoNomad, SoundChris and headphoamz). Memorable, strong accompaniment in both broken and... unbroken... chords (also that descending bassline again!), and the flow is gorgeous.

What's more, you have some very masterful compositional touches, such as the dissonance around the 3 minute mark, the usual grace notes (which might have been a tad overused at times) and how you hold back the final note for such a long time, rounding off the ending nicely. The mood change at the end works very well, as does the 4:28 transition. And NO REVERSE CYMBALS. HIGH-FIVE! By the way, amazing piano sound. That can't be a soundfont - what did you use?

I'm a bit torn about the first half of the track. It feels a bit like it's dying to be more rubato, and yet it's got a pretty rigid, almost quantized tempo. For the most part, you still keep it sounding realistic, mostly due to how damn good that piano sample is (and your dynamics), and you still keep it expressive, mostly due to how damn good that melody is! Still, some more prominent rubato touches would have given the song a bit more of an edge, I feel.

More importantly, this seems to lack the intricacy of some of your other tracks. Switching to an entirely emotional and expressive style might have taken away from the intricacy and thoughtfulness I've come to expect from you. While this was hardly a problem in the first 3 minutes of the track, which are more sad and reflective, it becomes a problem once the song becomes more uplifting. The wind sound got monotonous, and the texture felt a bit bland.

While I don't think it matches up to your Round 2 track, I loved this. Generally, if a track gives you goosebumps the first time you hear it, it means the track is really damn good, and that was the case with me. So enjoy my really damn good score and great work trying a style that you're not as experienced in and doing so well!

Score: 9.2/10

johnfn responds:

Step it seems like I can always count on you. Your reviews are always so rewarding to read because we practically agree on every point. Like when I was writing the melody for this song I was like "dang... this is the best melody I've ever written. I hope someone realizes that." Boom Step comes in to save the day. I really believe melody is the most important part of the song, so I'm glad that it worked out.

Or the thing about rubato. Honestly I didn't even know what the word rubato meant until you said it, but while I was writing the piece I was like "I wish I could speed up and slow down the tempo somehow." And I would have done it, except I had no clue how to do it! Now that I can google for rubato though, I won't leave it out again.

> NO REVERSE CYMBALS

Just for you <3

> which might have been a tad overused at times

THIS IS THE ONLY THING I DISAGREE WITH. YOU CANT OVERUSE GRACE NOTES. GRACE NOTES ON EVERY NOTE. GRACE NOTES ON GRACE NOTES. GRACENOTECEPTION.

> That can't be a soundfont - what did you use?

It's the Alicia's Keys VST, and I agree, it really is fabulous. The tone of the piano was actually partially the inspiration of the piece. It's a very snowy, wintery thing, I feel.

> it becomes a problem once the song becomes more uplifting

This is an interesting point, I've never really thought about it this way. I'm not very good with writing intricate orchestral currently, but I can always improve :)

> While I don't think it matches up to your Round 2 track

I actually agree. I chose this style because I felt like the judges have a bias towards orchestral. :D Actually, while I would love for that to be true, it's not. I tried to write an intricate electronic songs but wasn't feeling it at all. I was feeling like the intricacy itself was the problem, so I decided to write a song that I would strip bare of everything aside from melody.

Finally can I thank you for taking the time out of your college schedule to write these miniature novels? They are insanely helpful, and I realize that finding that time is not an easy thing to do.

[Esperanza de la Vega]

This is an NGADM Round 4 review.

--

My god, this is such a hard track to analyse. What you've done here is make a solo-instrument, rubato track, which is again in a style you don't have experience in, so basically, it's the biggest risk you could have possibly taken. The important question is... did it work?

I had my doubts at first. I listened to this in a bus ride on the way back from university, and its complexity, coupled with the environmental noise and the fact that I keep my headphones on a low volume, made me not understand the piece at all. It took a few listens for me to 'get' the piece, and after that I managed to actually pick up on some ingenious chord progressions, enjoyable melody-answering, and clever repetitions of certain motifs. Plus, the ending is such a fantastic way of tying a bow on everything. It's amazing how a more careful analysis of a track can shape one's impression of it.

With regards to the production value, I obviously can't fault it. The quality of your sounds are just god-tier, including those dancer steps. Where did you get them from? They not only fit with the theme and sounded fantastic but their dryness and humanisation made it sound like I was watching a whole performance, rather than something that was scripted entirely in a DAW. I've got to say, this track sounds very authentic, and really puts you in the right atmosphere.

I can see why you decided to cut down on the amount of instruments used, but unfortunately the incohesion is still here. It's not a mixing issue this time, but the way you set up the track in such a hard-to-follow, carefree kind of style sometimes cut down on the enjoyment value. Having a contrast between more rigidly-structured sections and the more rubato sections you have now would have been a better option for this track, since it keeps the authentic sound while providing a more united experience.

Now of course this is entirely my opinion, and it's definitely a controversial one that may have even simply stemmed from the fact that I am a relatively inexperienced musician who admittedly found this a hard track to understand, but I still think not having the aforementioned contrast is a flaw for a track like this. Nevertheless, I can't fault your absolutely incredible command over melody and harmony. Excellent job, you're an amazing musician.

Score: 9.1/10

SoundChris responds:

Thanks step wor another epic review. Didnt think this would be hard to analyze because this kind of guitarplaying is quite classical (it was hard to choose if i should put this into solo instrument, world or even classic). Flamenco stuff has got its very own characteristics, e.g. th permanently changing speed from slow to extremely fast - its very impulsive and ardent. Also the tonality is different to the normaly common one in the western culture because it has got arabic influences. And even if this seems to be unplayable at some points, i really have listened to some guitarists who did even more spectacular flamenco action, which almost was unbelievable. Great interpreters of spanish style guitar music are e.g. Don Cortes Maya and Andres Segovia. I have been inspired of several spanish pieces which i know from my childhood like "requerdos del al´Hambra", "Asturias" and so on.
Another stylistic aspect is the end. In spanish music you can often hear a final furious rage and prompt closing guitar-chord cut.

Glad you liked the piece! I recommend to listen to some flamenco pieces out there - they are really impressive and guid a totally new way of approaching on new musical projects. Thats why i have chosen this genre :D

[Asylum]

I have AT LAST gotten around to writing my in-depth analysis of your newest version of this track. Sorry for taking AGES. I got kind of overwhelmed with the amount of work I had to do these last few days. Thankfully, this track is just awesome, so I won't have a hard time reviewing it at all. But I'll try not to make my review full of praise.

As (I think) I said in the NGMT thread, this has a gorgeous intro with highly memorable chord changes. If I didn't say it, then I should have said it, since I think that this has the best intro from all the NGMT Round 2 tracks. That soft choir conveyed strong feelings of solitude, and almost sadness, with a slight tinge of suspense, and I love how the whole pace of the intro changed so well with the introduction of the staccato strings. As I said in the PM, I still think that the introduction of those staccato strings wasn't subtle enough, but I nevertheless enjoyed how they shifted the direction of the intro. And hey, the ending is awesome too. Nothing to complain about over there.

Really nice instrumentation. One of the things that remained stuck in my head after listening to this was how this has such a distinct ethnic quality with the choirs and the duduk especially. Plus, the duduk is my favourite non-standard woodwind instrument, so I loved listening to it. Your combination of the duduk and the more ambient, cinematic elements such as the strings in the latter section of the piece created this truly wonderful ambience, which I love.

The production is good. I mean, barring the fact that I had to turn the volume up to appreciate this song fully, you have a super dynamic mix, lots of reverb that works wonders for the atmosphere, and solid mixing of all the instruments. Plus, the instrument sample quality is through the roof and you use that to its full potential to make a track that sounds authentic and enveloping.

And my god, that buildup is so nice now. Your addition of low end elements, more powerful drums, and the huge 2:16 hit made it so much better than how it was in its preceding version. It's a very gradual buildup that becomes truly intense and exciting around the 2-minute mark. The way you built the track down right after that eargasm was neat too.

There's not much of a melody in this track. Like what often happens in tracks like these, I found myself longing for a more definable melody, especially in the latter section where the track focuses solely on creating ambience. However, your chords are still memorable and solid, so I can forgive you! What I think this tracks succeeds the most in is depicting imagery. Great atmospheres, mood changes, transitions between moods and all that jazz. Probably one of my favourite things about this track.

Yeah, this is fantastic. I don't have much else to say (except that your percussion is pretty darn awesome). Brilliant work - while I don't think this matches up to Labbaik in terms of enjoyment value, it's still an incredibly enjoyable and memorable track with awesome atmospheric value. Keep up the good work pls kthx.

10/10
5/5
Download

bassfiddlejones responds:

Step, your reviews are awesome and ridiculous. Thank you for taking the time to write this! I tried very hard to make this better than the previous version of the track, which was sorely lacking in a few areas. I am also a huge fan of the duduk, and probably use it more often than I should, but it's just so darn good.

One thing I need to work on is my mastering. Still trying to find the right balance between compression and fidelity to dynamics and whatnot. I'm quite glad you enjoyed this, thanks for the review/download! It holds great weight in my eyes.

[the traveller]

This is an NGADM Round 3 review.

--

Fixing the transitions because SkyeWintrest is judging is one thing. But making a terrible ending just to troll him because he's judging? Well, that's something else. I swear I heavily considered giving bonus points just for that. That's just hilarious. What's also amusing is that this is actually a very pleasant and well-composed track despite it being something of an experiment (and a very successful troll attempt because when I notified Skye of your ending he was like "WHAT"). You have some spectacular composition, that may seem a bit a slow-paced but is actually jam-packed with a bunch of melodic subtleties, harmonies and sweet motifs.

One thing I really like about this track is that it depicts a journey so well that there is literally not that much of a reason to stay following your intended storyline in the Author's Comments. The first part sounds just like a hometown, and what follows is very much of a "farewell" kind of deal. The song blends seamlessly into a more serious note as the adventurer makes his way to the desert (I'm being honest; great transition), and also morphs very well into the showdown (which OF COURSE is on top of a train in the desert. Seriously! Who didn't see that coming?). Really, you've got great transitions on the whole, and a nice structure to boot! Not a conventional structure for sure, but one that conveys a story.

What else do I like about this track? Well, the way the song opens up fourteen seconds in was just beautiful. I loved that! 1:23's little melodic phrase, while leaning ever so slightly onto the cheesy side, was also magnificently incorporated into the track, especially since you repeat it various times. I think your introduction of a breakbeat towards the end of the track was dubious at first, but I've got to admit, it's the kind of thing that, in some odd way, grows on you. Neat high pass filter on the bass at 4:31. It successfully managed to create expectations that the track was about to burst into a more exciting new section.

Really, I actually enjoyed this a lot! It hardly sounds "orchestral" in the way quite a few other NGADM Round 2 tracks were. This has its own unique little charm and even though you probably don't have amazing instrument samples, I don't think it showed in this track at all. A few issues you need to iron out though. Your reverse cymbal is again far too loud. It was also used too much. You milked it to the point that it cheapened almost every transition it was implemented in, which is a shame because you had a few impressive transitions. You have some nice percussion, but your tambourine is way too upfront in the mix. As much as I would love to give you bonus points for the ending, it is abrupt haha. There's a nasty drum roll leading to it that sounds really unprocessed and harsh; do away with that.

Scattered with a bunch of issues, but this was actually great fun to listen to, and I still can't get over how awesome you are for trolling Skye. Keep it up! Side note: was the melody in this track inspired by this? http://goo.gl/zYo0ZK

Score: 8.7/10

johnfn responds:

Step, thank you thank you THANK YOU as always for the amazing and detailed reviews. I'm glad it generally worked for you. Doing songs with visualizations is actually a rare thing for me, so I'm finding it neat that that worked out too.

The funny thing about the reverse cymbal is that I have a blind spot for it. Like I slip it in and then I just never hear it in the mix again, and then eventually everyone is like "omg your reverse cymbal what were you thinking!!!" And then I hear it for the first time and I'm like "oops." This happens to me all the time, lol. So I will promise not to use one in NGADM4. That should help me fix up my transitions.

Good call on the tams.

This song was seriously rushed so I can understand all the minor issues and will definitely keep an eye out next time.

I was actually really nervous that the ending would be my downfall... or at the very least, SkyeWintrest would give me a 0/10 as a countertroll. So I'm glad I can troll and get away with it ;D

P.S. actually no, that was not an inspiration - I haven't played that game. Though one of my worries about doing the descending baseline idea (C->B->A->G->F) is that all of the different uses sound similar. I believe the first time I learned of the idea was when I was dissecting this homestuck song a few months ago: http://homestuck.bandcamp.com/track/alternia (gorgeous song, btw), or perhaps this one hour compo song http://compo.thasauce.net/files/td244_-_Haunting_memories(OHC205).mp3 (again, gorgeous... and done in one hour too... it's the descending baseline, I tells ya!)

[Another Day]

This is an NGADM Round 3 review.

--

And we're back to chiptune that's intended to have vocals but doesn't! Not that it's a bad thing; you're one of the best chiptune artists on this site, and for a good reason. Yet again, you deliver with excellent mixing, strong in-your-face lead synths and the meatiest, brawniest chiptune drums I've ever heard in my life. I like the presence of the bass over here; you can really hear it and feel it, giving the track plenty of depth, especially in parts like 0:18. The panning in the intro section is pretty cool too. How did I notice panning when I'm deaf in my right ear, you ask? I went to hear it with headphones one time and realised I could only hear half of the intro. So yeah.

Pretty nice composition. I can feel an absence of a lead element here (for example, 2:11's hits sound like they were made to accompany vocal syllables) and there are quite a few sections where the track's foreground is just not really there, or not present enough in the mix. However, the composition that you do have is happy, energetic and perfectly enjoyable. I loved the rhythmic elements at the very beginning and how you repeat them a few seconds later at 0:18 with drums and a bassline supporting in the background. It kind of made 0:06 sound a bit premature, since it didn't last very long, but nevertheless, it works and will probably make more sense with vocals.

The transitions are all great. 0:16 in particular is one of my favourite transitions in the whole track, because it transitions back to the pattern that was played at the beginning so well that it made me smile the first time I heard it (and various subsequent times). Other than that, the transitions were smooth and it felt like each section naturally led to the next. In terms of structure, I would've liked that rhythmic motif you played at the beginning to show up somewhere else rather than just the beginning and at 0:18, but otherwise you have a good structure, along with a sweet intro and ending. Nice work!

You know what I'm going to say next. Yeah, this needs vocals, or some kind of lead instrument, as I mentioned above. Parts like 0:59 especially are simply just background. The lack of a lead element didn't annoy me as much here as it did in, say, Wolftacular's submission, but it's still very much present over here as you're aware. Apart from that, there's the same issue you had with your Round 1 submission. The absence of dynamic changes and breaks from the "chiptune on steroids" sections really makes the track hard on the ears and unpleasant to listen to at times (even moreso to someone like me who listens to each NGADM track countless times before and while reviewing).

Anyway, you've got a good track with, as always, impeccable production and perfectly good composition, that really solidifies my belief that you're one of the most capable chiptune artists on Newgrounds. Lack of a lead element was the biggest issue here, but good work otherwise!

Score: 7.8/10

midimachine responds:

the motif at the start is played pretty much continuously until the breakdown haha
probably should've pushed it louder and centered it more though
cheers!

[Real Life Absurdities]

This is an NGADM Round 3 review.

--

Again, I am utterly blown away. You're so talented at what you do that I am left in envy and wish that one day I can successfully create the quirkiness and forward motion that your latest two NGADM tracks present with ease. Where do I start? I think I'll try and avoid the generic comments I make for your pieces (great composition, great transitions, etc) and try and point out some more specific aspects of this track that I adore. First off, the transition at 0:36 is SUPERB. It's so understated and simple, but works incredibly well. Then, after that cute little music box section, everything comes together beautifully. Just wow.

Regarding the sounds you've used, they are, again, just perfect. I don't know if you used Edirol again or not but whatever the case, they should hire you to compose the VST demos for it, because you make it sound so good. It feels like each sound of yours has its own attitude, because you put so much care into each one! The trumpet that comes in at 0:08, especially, has such a great quirky attitude that listening to it for the first time certainly made me grin. Oh, and there's some subtle synth you keep in the background of the track (sounds a bit like something one would use as a synth in some comical alien scene) which sounds awesome, by the way. Something I like about this is despite the fact that this style has become quite a trademark of yours now, it's still a unique style that you rarely hear anywhere else.

One thing I feel this track does better than any other track of yours is the flow of the melody. Every single melodic passage/riff leads so smoothly and naturally to the next. This might be because you generally sacrificed adding any changes of pace/mood, making it much easier to keep a smooth and consistent flow, but for a track like this I feel like this wasn't that much of a problem. Regarding production, for the second time you've left me almost speechless by how good the production value is! You've presented the clear and well-balanced sound you had in your Round 2 submission, and this time I feel like you added more sounds playing together, making the clarity of this track all the more commendable.

I disagree with johnfn that this beats your Round 1 track. For me, it doesn't beat it by a very slight amount, and let me tell you why. I feel like the track is ultimately a bit of an unsatisfying listen. Everything seems to go by so quickly. The track is short, the pace is ridiculously quick, and the intro just gets into the meat of the track instantly. It's a fitting intro (despite sounding quite jarring at first) but it doesn't have much progression at all. Couple that with the short length of 2 minutes and 11 sections and you've got a track, once listened to, leaves a desire for more. Also, 0:42 - 1:05 has inferior melodic material to the rest of the track in my honest opinion.

I'm mentioning mostly nitpicks. Due to that, you get a high score for me again once more. Brilliant work, keep up this pace!

Score: 9.6/10

steampianist responds:

Thank you once again for this wall-of-a-review

And yes I guess it is fast pace and short. I actually told myself I need to finish this in 5 days due to I have other commissions and wanted to work on vocaloid songs.. im really hooked on vocaloids :)

awww... but I like the melody at 0:42 :(

Hehe anyway still happy I got a nine from you I will give my all again in round 4 and thank you again